![]() ![]() Not only is it your first attempt at independent life free from parents’ oversight, but it’s also a completely new level of academic requirements and independent study many aren’t ready for.Īnd if you’re an overachiever or a perfectionist, keeping up with all the classes, assignments, extracurriculars, and side gigs will keep you up most nights. After all, college is an eye-opening experience for most students. ![]() (For more ideas on how to teach both cohesion and coherence, see Chapters 2 and 3 of Beyond the Sentence, Macmillan, 2005).If you’re suddenly wondering, “Can someone do my paper for me?”, there’s likely a very good reason for that. Keeping your reader in mind does not guarantee coherence, but it would seem to be a prerequisite. Good writers are able to "keep their reader in mind". This means that it is important that, when doing writing tasks, students have a clear idea both of the purpose of the text, and of the intended readership. More important still, is second-guessing the intended reader's questions, and then answering them. This has long been the approach to teaching business, technical, and academic writing. This means that learners can be helped to write coherent texts through the analysis of the generic features of particular text types. If the content of a (written) text is organised in such a way that it fulfills the reader's expectations, it is more likely to achieve its communicative effect. Identifying lexical chains in texts - that is, repetitions, the use of synonyms and hyponyms, and words from the same lexical field - is also a useful way of alerting learners to the key role that lexis has in binding a text together.Ĭoherence is more elusive but it has a lot to do with the way that the propositional content of texts is organised. ![]() I am fond of using short articles from children's encyclopedias. Cutting (short) texts up and asking learners to order them is a good way of drawing attention to the way that they are linked. (For a comprehensive list, see the entry under cohesion in An A-Z of ELT, Macmillan, 2006). There are a variety of cohesive devices, both lexical and grammatical, of which linkers ( and, so ,but) are just one. The way that textual cohesion is achieved is best learned through paying close attention to the way sentences are linked in texts. So, to return to the second part of the question, what are some practical ways to teach cohesion and coherence? So, he went out the door and walked to the bus stop. Finally, he made another decision, that he must go to work. However, he realized his boss might get angry because he did not go to the office. Then, he sat down to enjoy his newspaper. Louie rushed and got ready for work, but, when he went out the door, he saw the snowstorm was very heavy. The following text (devised by the writer on writing, Ann Raimes) is an example of a text that is "over-egged" with cohesive markers, and which is typical of the kind of texts that many students produce as a result of an over-emphasis on linking devices at the expense of other ways of making texts cohesive (of which probably the most important is lexis): ![]() Nevertheless, a text which is basically poorly organised is not going to be made more coherent simply by peppering it with moreover, however and notwithstanding. with cohesive devices such as and, but, so, can make it easier for the reader (or listener) to process and to make sense of what they read (or hear). While it is true that a sequence of unlinked utterances can make sense, it is often the case that some form of linking, e.g. The exact relationship between cohesion and coherence is a matter of contention, however. A text may be coherent to you, but incoherent to me. Thus, cohesion is objectively verifiable, while coherence is more subjective. Put simply, then: cohesion is a formal feature of texts (it gives them their texture), while coherence is "in the eye of the beholder" - that is to say, it is the extent to which the reader (or listener) is able to infer the writer's (or speaker's) communicative intentions. Sustainable Development and Global Citizenship. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |